The Theory: My company has made losses for several years. If someone buys us out they can use these losses against their own profit and save a lot of money in Corporation Tax.
The Logic: A business that makes a £10,000 profit this year will have to pay (at current rates) £2,000 in Corporation Tax. However, if they make a £10,000 loss they not only pay no Corporation Tax this year but they can make £10K of profit next year and balance that profit against the current loss to leave a net taxable figure of £0.
So past losses have value in that, to the extent of that past loss, you can make a future profit without incurring a tax liability.
The Reality: The government doesn’t like the idea of buying a business to make such use of the losses and there are numerous restrictions that frustrate the use of this tax “concession” when it comes to acquired businesses.
The Legal Restrictions To Using Past Losses
1. An acquiring company can’t use the losses unless they can generate an equivalent amount of profit from the business first! (So if they can’t make £10K in profit … they have no profit against which to write off the losses.)
2. Under the group relief rules, losses built up in a company prior to it being acquired cannot be transferred to the Head Office of the acquiring company or to another company in the group. They can only be used against profits made in the company which originally made the loss. This is a major impediment as most acquiring companies don’t want to invest the time, money and risk to turn the target company around and make it profitable.
3. If the buyer makes enough changes in the business to make it profitable … they’ll probably lose the benefit of the losses! Yes, the profit has to be made in the same business, doing the same trade, and without significant changes to the business or the losses will be er, lost.
1. It is not cost effective to buy £50K or £100K of accumulated losses. Contrary to what most sellers of small businesses appreciate, it costs buyers a lot of money to find prospective acquisitions and even more money to properly check them out prior to making the purchase.
These “due diligence” checks cost thousands of pounds and, sometimes, tens of thousands of pounds. They are far, far more detailed than the checks a conveyancing solicitor does through the course of buying a residential property.
It is not worth a buyer spending £10K in legal, accounting and other fees unless the business is worth several hundred thousand pounds.
2. To avail of those losses the buyer has to buy the shares of the business, not the assets. We’ve discussed share sale vs asset sale here. Buyers generally prefer to buy assets rather than shares. However, if they wish to use the business’ retained losses to set off against future profits, they need to buy the shares of the business. If they buy the assets they do not get their hands on the retained losses.
3. HMRC watch these transactions very, very carefully and are looking for excuses to prevent businesses from using this tactic. HMRC keep a close eye on whether the trade carried on after the sale is the same as the trade that was being conducted before the sale. If there’s a deviation, bang goes the tax savings. Small changes in the customer base can, too, invalidate a company’s ability to carry forward the losses to use against future profit!
There are several other circumstances that get in the way of businesses buying and using the losses of a different entity. This is by no means an easy route.
Valuation - So How Much Is The Loss Worth?
Here’s how sellers often think: I’ve made £10K in loss, so I should be able to sell the business for £10K.
Unfortunately, that’s not going to happen.
Buyers aren’t keen on buying businesses to make use of the losses because, given the restrictions above, they might never be able to use those losses against future profit and, bear in mind, that’s the only benefit to buying these losses in the first place.
Even assuming the buyer is willing to take this risk, the maximum the loss can be worth to him is not the full extent of the loss but the amount of tax saving that loss represents.
So the maximum worth is not £10,000 in the previous example, it’s £2,000 (the potential savings in tax at a tax rate of 20%.)
In fact, even £2000 is way too much. There’s no sense in paying £2,000 in advance to the seller just to save £2,000 of tax in future.
A far better option for the buyer is to avoid making the purchase and instead to pay £2,000 to the tax man only IF he makes a profit in future. What’s more, the payment itself falls far into the future.
To make it worth the buyer’s effort the seller is going to have to accept only a portion of the potential tax savings, say 50%. (It’s often far less.)
But all is not lost.
Shifting risk to the seller: Where a buyer is willing to make such a purchase i.e. to buy a firm’s entire accumulated loss, he might seek to reduce his risk by not paying the seller in advance but instead entering into a contract to pay that sum only on successfully using those losses against future profits.
A seller agreeing to those terms has a better chance of finding a buyer for his business.
The risk to the seller here is that the buyer may never make sufficient profit to offset against the losses, and if he doesn’t make those profits the seller will effectively have made nothing from the arrangement.
Other Options To Sell Losses
In the US, you can “convert” your losses to “tax credits” and sell those tax credits. In fact, there are several exchanges where tax credits are traded. There is no such liquid market for retained losses in the UK.
If the size of the deal is particularly large there is one complicated and convoluted option potentially available to the seller. It is explained here, but that route is not available to the average small business. The deal size needs to be in the tens of millions of pounds to make that viable.
There are a couple of other possible ways to extract value from losses, but they depend on the individual circumstances of your business. Use the contact link at the top of this page to arrange a confidential consultation to see if we can help in your particular case. A recent client had £400K of accumulated losses on their books and we were able to assist them to extract £140,000 of value from the company i.e. we were able to convert 35% of those losses into cash in the bank.
Other Assets - Looking At The Bigger Picture
The discussion so far has revolved around the sale of a company’s losses and focused solely on losses. There is, of course, often value outside of the monetary value of the tax savings represented by those losses. Businesses may have assets such as stock and vehicles.
Even intangible assets such as the company website, software created or modified by the company, licences and permits, copyright, trademarks (even if not registered), know-how, awards won, designs created, in-house documentation compiled to manage the business, processes and systems developed over time etc., have value.
However, most business owners struggle to even identify the intangible assets and it takes expert assistance to be able to extract maximum value for them far less also extract value for the retained losses.
We can help. Get in touch if you would like to have a confidential initial conversation to discuss your own circumstances.
Related: How To Successfully Sell An Insolvent Business